The AI Bubble: Is Nvidia a Signal of Market Instability?
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding the AI Market Landscape
In recent years, there has been increasing concern regarding the soaring prices of AI stocks, with many experts warning of a potential market bubble about to burst. While proponents of artificial intelligence have often dismissed these worries, asserting that the technology will transform numerous sectors worldwide, the latest developments suggest that the bubble may indeed be forming, with Nvidia serving as a key indicator.
Nvidia recently reported that it exceeded its earnings expectations, generating an impressive $30 billion in revenue over a three-month period—essentially doubling its sales compared to the same timeframe last year. This remarkable performance has solidified Nvidia's dominance, now accounting for over 80% of the AI chip market. However, despite this significant achievement, Nvidia's stock price dropped by 6% post-announcement, along with declines in associated companies like Meta and Amazon. This perplexing downturn exemplifies the classic dynamics of a market bubble.
Before delving deeper, let’s clarify what constitutes a market bubble. A market bubble is characterized by excessive investment in a stock or sector, often detached from solid business fundamentals, leading to inflated valuations. Historical instances include the tulip mania of the 1600s, Japan’s real estate bubble in the 1990s, and the dot-com bubble at the turn of the millennium.
Ultimately, market bubbles are not sustainable and inevitably burst, often triggered by a market correction that brings investors back to reality, prompting widespread sell-offs that can devastate associated sectors or even entire economies. These corrections may unfold gradually over a year or two, especially when significant corporations are involved. Nonetheless, if a bubble exists, a collapse is unavoidable.
So, is the AI sector experiencing a bubble? Nvidia, currently the largest player in the AI space, has seen its stock price surge by 3,000% since 2019, yet its revenue has only increased by 60% in the same period. While Nvidia has new technologies on the horizon, they do not represent a monumental shift from its existing products, indicating that its stock price may indeed reflect a bubble mentality. This trend is mirrored in various other AI-focused stocks, such as Tesla.
What then triggered the investors' unease? One would think that record revenue would encourage continued investment. However, market analysts have provided insight into this reaction. Simon French, head of research at Panmure Liberum, noted that Nvidia's sales growth was disappointingly low compared to prior performance, stating, "If you’re going to raise expectations that high, then you’ve got to keep growing at spectacular rates." Similarly, Matt Britzman, a senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, mentioned that merely meeting estimates is no longer sufficient; the market anticipates significant growth, and the modest outperformance this time has let investors down.
To summarize, the sell-off in Nvidia shares stemmed from unmet investor expectations, despite the company doubling its revenue year-over-year—an indication of the typical behavior associated with a bubble.
However, the concerns extend beyond revenue figures. Nvidia's business model of supplying AI chips has come under scrutiny. For instance, OpenAI, one of Nvidia's largest clients, has indicated that developing next-generation AI models will require such immense energy that breakthroughs like nuclear fusion may be necessary for sustainability. If this trend continues, OpenAI may reduce its orders for Nvidia chips. Compounding matters, OpenAI is projected to incur a $5 billion loss by year-end and could face bankruptcy. The potential loss of such a major client could adversely affect Nvidia's revenue and stock performance.
OpenAI remains the highest-earning AI service provider, but if it can't turn a profit, it raises the question: who can? David Cahn, a partner at Sequoia Capital, echoed this concern. With over 60% of Sequoia’s investments directed towards AI companies, Cahn found that these firms, including Google, Meta, Microsoft, AWS, and OpenAI, are set to spend $150 billion on AI chips—predominantly from Nvidia. Yet, the operational costs for these chips could also reach $150 billion annually. To achieve a return on their significant chip investments, these leading AI firms would need to generate an additional $600 billion in revenue, tripling the current total for the industry.
Given the stagnation in AI development, despite rising R&D expenditures, and the acknowledgment by AI companies that next-gen models remain unfeasible, one must question whether Nvidia can sustain its record chip sales.
I suspect that many investors, particularly institutional ones, are beginning to recognize that Nvidia's sales growth is not meeting their high expectations and are cashing out before the potential collapse of this bubble. This could very well be the first indication of a market correction on the horizon.
Thank you for taking the time to read this analysis. If you appreciate content like this and wish to support it, or gain early access to articles, consider following me and my project, Planet Earth & Beyond.
(Originally published on PlanetEarthAndBeyond.co)
Sources: Will Lockett, BBC, Sky, The Independent, Statista