Understanding Pascal's Wager: The Unexpected Roots of Expected Value
Written on
Chapter 1: The Significance of Pascal's Wager
Pascal's Wager is a notable argument that intertwines philosophy and mathematics to advocate for belief in God. While discussions about faith and reason are common, Pascal's Wager stands out for two reasons: it conceptualizes belief as a "wager," and it was proposed by Blaise Pascal, a luminary in the scientific community. To fully grasp the intricacies of this argument, we must first delve into the life of Blaise Pascal, which lays the groundwork for understanding his core thesis.
Who Was Blaise Pascal? The Prodigy
Blaise Pascal, born in 1623, emerged as one of France's foremost scientific minds. His father, a tax collector with a passion for science and mathematics, raised Pascal and his two sisters after the death of their mother when Pascal was just three. This unique upbringing allowed Pascal to engage with scientific thought early on, leading to him being recognized as a child prodigy. At the age of 16, he penned a groundbreaking essay on conic sections that impressed even the likes of René Descartes.
The Inventor and the Philosopher
In his youth, Pascal invented one of the earliest mechanical calculators, the Pascaline, to assist his father with tax computations. He also made significant contributions to physics, particularly in hydraulic principles and the concept of a vacuum, challenging the prevailing belief in "Ether."
As he matured, Pascal transitioned into philosophy and theology, grappling with personal health issues until his untimely death at 39. Despite his brief life, his impact was monumental, exemplified by the S.I. unit of pressure named after him, the programming language Pascal, and the Nvidia Pascal GPU series. His legacy continues to resonate profoundly in various fields.
The Birth of Pascal's Wager
In 1654, while attempting to solve a gambling problem for his friend Antoine Gombaud, Pascal began corresponding with Pierre de Fermat, laying the groundwork for probability theory. However, a transformative spiritual experience redirected Pascal's focus from mathematics to theology. By the time Fermat reached out in 1660, Pascal had shifted his perspective, stating:
"I find little difference between a man who is merely a geometrician and a skilled artisan... my studies have led me so far from this thinking that I can hardly remember that geometry exists."
Two years later, Pascal passed away, but his posthumous work "Pensées" revealed his profound theological and philosophical insights, with point 233 laying the foundation for what became known as Pascal's Wager.
What Is Pascal's Wager? A Mathematical Perspective
Pascal's Wager proposes a unique approach to the existence of God through a mathematical lens. He begins by discussing the immense difference between the finite and the infinite, suggesting that while humans can grasp finite concepts, infinity remains elusive. He compares this to the concept of God, asserting that our limited understanding prevents us from conclusively determining God's existence.
Employing a thought experiment, Pascal posits that, while we may not fully comprehend the divine, we must consider the implications of belief. He frames this as a probabilistic scenario, delineating two possibilities: either God exists or He does not, and similarly, an individual's belief or disbelief.
He constructs a decision matrix that forms the basis of utility theory, positing that belief in God entails a pious life, potentially leading to infinite rewards if God exists. Conversely, disbelief allows for worldly pleasures but results in finite gains.
The Essence of Pascal's Wager
Pascal argues that the finite pleasures of life are negligible compared to the infinite potential rewards of faith. He eloquently states that when one risks nothing, they stand to gain everything. Thus, based solely on expected utility, he concludes that it is rational to believe in God, regardless of the ultimate truth.
The brilliance of Pascal's Wager lies in its approach; rather than attempting to prove God's existence, it presents a rational framework for decision-making based on potential outcomes. Historical figures like Voltaire critiqued Pascal's position, suggesting that the beauty of the world implies a creator.
Counterarguments to Pascal's Wager
It is essential to consider the critiques of Pascal's Wager. Critics highlight that Pascal himself acknowledged that reason could not definitively answer the question of God's existence. Tweaking the assumptions leads to alternative outcomes; for instance, what if God punishes belief?
In such a scenario, the expected utility for belief would yield infinite loss, undermining the rationale for faith. Additionally, modeling nuanced scenarios where individuals feign belief introduces complexities that challenge Pascal's original framework.
Author's Perspective on Pascal's Wager
I have great respect for Pascal's intellectual rigor and his willingness to engage with profound questions. While Pascal's Wager occupies an important space in philosophical discourse, I believe its mathematical aspects were ahead of their time. The concept of the "rational human" is a flawed premise, as contemporary research by thinkers like Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky illustrates.
In my experience within quantitative finance, I often encountered market participants relying on expected utility models, which would frequently lead to arbitrage opportunities. In the realm of wagers, certainty is rare, and when it appears, it must be seized.
In conclusion, I invite you to share your thoughts on this topic in the comments. Engaging in discussions about such complex issues can be both enlightening and stimulating!
Further Reading
For those interested in exploring more, consider "The Thrilling Story Of Calculus and Logarithms: The Long Forgotten Story Of Scientific Progress." Your support as an author is greatly appreciated, and you can also contribute on Patreon.